Children pelting a police vehicle with stones . KT Photo: Imran Ali |
Defining
"child" and "child soldier"
[Source: Child Soldiers: Victims or War Criminals? — Regional Academy on the United Nations
http://www.ra-un.org/uploads/4/7/5/4/47544571/child_soldiers_-_victims_or_war_criminals.pdf]
http://www.ra-un.org/uploads/4/7/5/4/47544571/child_soldiers_-_victims_or_war_criminals.pdf]
Before we are able to analyze criminal
responsibility of child soldiers, we need to firstly determine what definitions
of "child" and "child soldier" are. According to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child, a child is "every human being below
the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority
is attained earlier".[1]
Taking into consideration that this treaty is the single most ratified human
rights treaty in the world, we shall take this definition as the operative for
the use of this paper. However, definitions of child soldiers have varied and
could have been deduced only indirectly from international conventions,
treaties or national legislation.
Although there are differences in the initial
age threshold for taking part in hostilities and being recruited by the armed
forces, all of the international instruments are generally leaning toward the
age limit of 18, some explicitly while others advise the same practice. The
operative definition of child soldier that the UNICEF is using, and that is
based on the Cape Town Principles from 1997, is that "a ‘child soldier’ is
any child – boy or girl – under 18 years of age, who is part of any kind of
regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including, but
not limited to: cooks, porters, messengers, and anyone accompanying such groups
other than family members".[2]
The Paris Principles from 2007 state that "A child associated with an
armed force or armed group” refers to any person below 18 years of age who is
or who has been recruited or used by an armed force or armed group in any
capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as
fighters, cooks, porters, messengers, spies or for sexual purposes. It does not
only refer to a child who is taking or has taken a direct part in
hostilities".[3] As we
can see, the Paris Principles have changed the phrase "child soldier"
to "a child associated with an armed force or armed group", but the
essence of the definition is the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment